V1
Back to handbooks index
v10 / 9.2 The Open Group Enterprise Architecture
Enterprise Architecture Framework

TOGAF
Handbook

A comprehensive reference for enterprise architects, IT strategists, and business leaders — covering the TOGAF standard, the Architecture Development Method (ADM), key components, governance, and practical guidance for real-world adoption.

ADM Cycle Architecture Domains EA Repository Governance Capability Framework TOGAF v10
📖

What Is TOGAF?

Definition, scope, and the problem it solves

TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a globally recognised framework for Enterprise Architecture (EA). It provides a standardised vocabulary, process model, and set of tools that organisations use to plan, design, and govern their business and IT landscape as a coherent whole.

At its core, TOGAF gives organisations a repeatable method for developing, managing, and using an enterprise architecture — ensuring that technology investments align with business strategy and that change is delivered in a structured, low-risk way.

A Standard, Not a Tool

TOGAF is a framework and methodology — a body of knowledge. It does not prescribe a specific software tool; organisations choose their own modelling tools (Archi, Sparx EA, LeanIX) to implement it.

Vendor-Neutral

Maintained by The Open Group, a neutral consortium. It is not owned by any technology vendor, making it applicable regardless of your technology stack or cloud provider.

Widely Adopted

Used by the majority of Fortune 500 companies, government agencies, and large enterprises worldwide. TOGAF certification is one of the most sought-after EA credentials globally.

🔑
Core definition: TOGAF is a framework for developing, maintaining, and governing enterprise architecture. It provides a structured approach through the Architecture Development Method (ADM) — a cyclical process covering business, data, application, and technology architecture, with integrated governance and change management.

What Problem Does It Solve?

Without TOGAF (Common Pain Points)
  • IT projects misaligned with business goals
  • Duplicated systems and shadow IT proliferation
  • No shared vocabulary between business and IT teams
  • Inability to assess the impact of organisational change
  • Technical debt accumulation with no visibility
  • Costly, high-risk large-scale transformations
With TOGAF (Outcomes Achieved)
  • Technology decisions traceable to business strategy
  • Consolidated, rationalised application portfolios
  • Shared language between CXO, IT, and operations
  • Structured impact analysis before making changes
  • Proactive technical debt management and roadmaps
  • Reduced risk and faster, more predictable delivery
🎯

Purpose & Goals

Why organisations adopt TOGAF and what it aims to achieve

TOGAF exists to answer one fundamental question: How do we ensure that every technology decision serves the long-term goals of the organisation? Its purpose spans strategic alignment, operational efficiency, and change management.

Strategic Alignment

Bridge the gap between business strategy and IT execution. Ensure every system, platform, and capability investment can be traced back to a business objective or outcome.

Standardisation

Establish a common language and approach across the enterprise. Prevent each department or project from developing siloed architectures incompatible with the rest of the organisation.

Informed Decision-Making

Provide a single source of truth — the Architecture Repository — so that decisions about change, procurement, or transformation are grounded in accurate, current data about the enterprise landscape.

Risk Reduction

Identify inter-dependencies, gaps, and conflicts before implementing change. A documented architecture lets you model the impact of decisions before spending a single dollar.

Agility & Reuse

Build a catalogue of reusable building blocks — patterns, services, and components — so future projects can leverage existing assets rather than rebuilding from scratch.

Governance

Define who approves architectural decisions, how compliance is checked, and how deviations are handled. Prevent ungoverned proliferation of technology that creates cost and risk.

ℹ️
Business value, not IT bureaucracy: TOGAF is sometimes mischaracterised as a heavyweight, IT-centric overhead. Its actual intent is to serve the business — connecting strategy to execution, improving time-to-market, reducing costs through reuse, and lowering the risk of transformation programs.
🕰️

History & Versions

From TAFIM to TOGAF 10 — the evolution of the standard
YearVersionMilestone
1995TOGAF 1First release. Based on the US Department of Defense's TAFIM (Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management).
1996–2001TOGAF 2–7Iterative refinement. ADM established as the central process. The Open Group Architecture Forum driven by industry contributors.
2002TOGAF 8"Enterprise Edition" — significant expansion. Enterprise Continuum introduced. Broadened from IT to full enterprise scope.
2009TOGAF 9Major overhaul. Architecture Content Framework, Architecture Repository, Architecture Capability Framework, and governance guidance formalised. Became the industry standard.
2011TOGAF 9.1Clarifications and bug fixes. No structural change. The version most certified professionals hold credentials in.
2018TOGAF 9.2Improved guidance on Agile architecture, business architecture, and security. Content restructured for clarity. Digital transformation coverage added.
2022TOGAF Standard v10Current version. Repackaged into a modular "Series" format. Core standard separated from guidance documents for easier adoption. Agile, DevOps, and cloud-native patterns incorporated.
📜
TOGAF 10 restructuring: Version 10 split the monolithic 9.x document into a Core Standard plus a series of guidance documents (Architecture Development, Architecture Capability, Reference Models). This modular approach lets organisations adopt only what is relevant to their maturity level.
⏱️

When To Use TOGAF

Right contexts, wrong contexts, and signs you need it

TOGAF is a heavyweight framework appropriate for large, complex organisations undergoing strategic change. It is not the right tool for every situation — understanding when to apply it (and when not to) is as important as knowing how.

✓ Use TOGAF When...
  • Undergoing digital transformation or major platform migration
  • Mergers, acquisitions, or post-merger IT integration
  • Government or regulated industry mandating architecture governance
  • Complex multi-department, multi-system landscapes need rationalisation
  • Business strategy is repeatedly undermined by technical constraints
  • Large-scale ERP, CRM, or core platform replacements
  • Standing up or maturing an Enterprise Architecture practice
  • Cloud migration strategy across hundreds of applications
✗ Consider Alternatives When...
  • Small organisations (<200 people) with a simple IT landscape
  • Startups moving at speed — overhead outweighs benefit
  • Projects with very narrow, well-defined scope (feature-level)
  • Fully Agile product teams doing continuous incremental delivery
  • No executive sponsorship or architecture team to sustain it
  • Organisations seeking only solution or application architecture
  • Teams that need lightweight governance (consider Scaled Agile / SAFe instead)
⚠️
Signs your organisation needs TOGAF: Duplicated or contradictory data across systems, failed or over-budget transformation programs, no clear IT roadmap tied to business strategy, inability to answer "what systems are affected if we change X?", and persistent misalignment between what IT builds and what the business actually needs.

Scale of Adoption

TOGAF does not need to be adopted all-or-nothing. Most organisations start with a subset:

Lightweight Start

Adopt the ADM and Architecture Repository. Focus on documenting the current state and defining a target architecture for a single major initiative.

Intermediate

Add governance through an Architecture Review Board (ARB). Define principles, standards, and a formal compliance process for new projects.

Full Capability

Mature capability with full stakeholder engagement, strategic roadmaps, Architecture Capability Framework, and continuous architecture lifecycle.

🏗️

Framework Structure

The four structural components of TOGAF

TOGAF is not a single monolithic document — it is structured around four interrelated components that together define how enterprise architecture is developed and governed.

1. Architecture Development Method (ADM)

The heart of TOGAF. A cyclical, phase-based process for developing architecture. It provides step-by-step guidance on how to create a baseline architecture, define a target architecture, and plan the transition between them.

  • Iterative and cyclical — not waterfall
  • Ten phases from Preliminary through ADM Requirements Management
  • Can be adapted to specific organisational needs
2. Architecture Content Framework

Defines what gets produced. A structured classification of architectural work products — deliverables, artefacts, and building blocks. Ensures consistency in what architecture outputs look like.

  • Deliverables: contractual outputs (e.g. Architecture Definition Document)
  • Artefacts: diagrams, catalogs, matrices
  • Building Blocks: reusable components (ABBs and SBBs)
3. Enterprise Continuum & Repository

A classification system and storage mechanism for architectural assets — from generic, reusable patterns (Foundation Architecture) through to organisation-specific assets (Organisation-Specific Architecture).

  • Architecture Repository stores all architectural assets
  • Reference Library, Standards Information Base, Solution Landscape
  • Enables reuse and prevents reinventing the wheel
4. Architecture Capability Framework

Defines how to establish and run an architecture function within an organisation. Covers roles, skills, governance structures, processes, and the maturity model for an architecture practice.

  • Architecture Board, Review processes, Compliance
  • EA maturity models and skills framework
  • Architecture contracts and principles
Remember the acronym ACEF: ADM + Content Framework + Enterprise Continuum + Capability Framework. Together these four components give you the process (ADM), the outputs (Content), the storage (Continuum), and the organisation (Capability).
🔄

The ADM Cycle

Architecture Development Method — the iterative process engine

The Architecture Development Method (ADM) is the central process of TOGAF. It is a cycle of phases that together describe how to plan, create, govern, and evolve enterprise architecture. Critically, it is iterative — you do not complete it once and shelve it. Architecture is continuously revisited as the business and technology landscape evolves.

Iterative by Design

The ADM can be iterated at three levels: the overall cycle (repeating as the business changes), within a phase (refining outputs), and across phases (returning to an earlier phase when new information emerges).

Adaptable to Context

TOGAF explicitly supports adapting the ADM. Phases can be combined, re-ordered, or run concurrently. Agile organisations often run phases in shorter sprints with lighter deliverables.

ℹ️
Baseline → Target → Transition: Every ADM cycle produces three views of the architecture. The Baseline describes where the organisation is now. The Target describes where it needs to be. The Transition Architecture(s) describe the intermediate states between the two, enabling staged delivery.
📋

ADM Phases

All ten phases — objectives, activities, and key outputs
PRE
Preliminary Phase
Set up the architecture capability. Define the organisational context, tailoring of TOGAF, architecture principles, and governance framework. Answer: Who are we as an architecture function and how will we operate?
Architecture Principles Tailored ADM Organisation Model for EA Architecture Framework
A
Phase A — Architecture Vision
Define the scope, constraints, and high-level vision for a given architecture engagement. Gain stakeholder buy-in. Produce a Statement of Architecture Work. Answer: What are we trying to achieve and why?
Architecture Vision Statement of Architecture Work Stakeholder Map Architecture Principles (refined)
B
Phase B — Business Architecture
Develop the baseline and target business architecture. Document business capabilities, processes, organisational structures, and how they relate to the strategic goals. Answer: What does the business do and how should it do it?
Business Architecture Document Process Diagrams Capability Map Organisation Map
C
Phase C — Information Systems Architecture
Develop data architecture (what data exists, how it flows, ownership) and application architecture (what systems exist and how they interact). These are often run in parallel. Answer: What information assets and applications are needed?
Data Architecture Document Application Architecture Document Data Flow Diagrams Application Interaction Matrix
D
Phase D — Technology Architecture
Define the technology landscape — infrastructure, platforms, networks, middleware, and cloud services needed to support the business, data, and application layers. Answer: What technical infrastructure underpins everything?
Technology Architecture Document Infrastructure Diagrams Technology Standards Platform Catalogue
E
Phase E — Opportunities & Solutions
Identify gaps between baseline and target, then identify solution options and work packages to close those gaps. Produce the first version of the Architecture Roadmap. Answer: How do we get from here to there?
Gap Analysis Results Architecture Roadmap v1 Work Packages Transition Architectures
F
Phase F — Migration Planning
Turn the roadmap into a detailed, prioritised, funded implementation plan. Align with portfolio management, programme management, and finance. Answer: Specifically when and how do we execute the roadmap?
Architecture Roadmap (final) Implementation & Migration Plan Prioritised Project List
G
Phase G — Implementation Governance
Provide architectural oversight during implementation. Ensure projects conform to the approved architecture, issue Architecture Contracts, and handle change requests. Answer: Are projects building what was agreed?
Architecture Contracts Compliance Assessments Change Requests Conformance Reports
H
Phase H — Architecture Change Management
Monitor the deployed architecture and the business/technology environment. Determine when a new ADM cycle is needed. Manage incremental changes that arise post-deployment. Answer: How do we keep the architecture current and relevant?
Architecture Update Requests Change Assessment Reports ADM Cycle Trigger
REQ
Requirements Management
A continuous process at the centre of the ADM cycle — not a linear phase. Manages, stores, and feeds architecture requirements into all other phases throughout the entire ADM lifecycle.
Requirements Repository Requirements Impact Assessment Prioritised Requirements
📄

Key Deliverables & Artefacts

The Architecture Content Framework — what TOGAF produces

The Architecture Content Framework classifies all TOGAF outputs into three types. Understanding the distinction helps teams know what level of formality and approval is required for each output.

Deliverables

Formally reviewed and signed-off outputs from an ADM phase. These are contractual commitments that must be approved before the next phase begins.

  • Architecture Definition Document
  • Architecture Requirements Specification
  • Statement of Architecture Work
  • Architecture Contract
  • Architecture Roadmap
Artefacts

Architectural work products — diagrams, lists, matrices — that are components within a deliverable. They describe an architecture from a specific viewpoint.

  • Catalogs (e.g. Application Catalogue)
  • Matrices (e.g. Application-Data Matrix)
  • Diagrams (e.g. Business Process Diagram)
  • Capability Maps
  • Stakeholder Maps
Building Blocks

Reusable components of business, IT, or architectural capability. Two types — ABBs and SBBs — form the basis of the Enterprise Continuum.

  • ABBs — Architecture Building Blocks (capability definitions)
  • SBBs — Solution Building Blocks (product/component implementations)
  • Example ABB: "Customer Identity Service"
  • Example SBB: "Azure Active Directory B2C"

Core Deliverable Summary

DeliverablePhasePurpose
Architecture VisionAHigh-level summary of stakeholder concerns and the end-state vision for the architecture engagement
Statement of Architecture WorkADefines the scope, schedule, constraints, and resources for an architecture engagement — a formal contract to proceed
Architecture Definition DocumentB/C/DThe primary deliverable containing baseline and target architectures across all four domains (Business, Data, Application, Technology)
Architecture Requirements SpecificationB/C/DQuantified and measurable requirements that the architecture must satisfy; drives conformance testing
Architecture RoadmapE/FSequenced work packages and projects that transition the enterprise from baseline to target state
Architecture ContractGFormal agreement between the architecture team and project delivery team on what will be built and how compliance is measured
Compliance AssessmentGReview of a project's architecture against the approved target architecture and standards
Implementation & Migration PlanFDetailed transition plan showing how work packages map to programmes, projects, timelines, and funding
🏛️

Architecture Domains (BDAT)

Business, Data, Application, Technology — the four-layer model

TOGAF organises enterprise architecture into four domains, often remembered by the acronym BDAT. Each layer informs the one below it — business requirements drive data needs, data needs drive application choices, and applications drive technology selection.

Business
Business strategy, capabilities, value streams, organisational structures, business processes, and how the organisation creates and delivers value. This layer drives all others.
Data
Enterprise data entities, data flows, ownership, quality standards, master data management, and information lifecycle. Describes what information the organisation needs to operate.
Application
The application landscape — systems, APIs, integrations, and how applications interact to support business processes and manage data. Includes logical and physical application models.
Technology
Infrastructure, platforms, cloud services, networks, middleware, and software environments that host and connect the applications. Describes the physical and virtual technology estate.
🔑
Traceability is the goal: The power of the four-domain model is that it creates traceability. A business capability can be traced to the data it depends on → the application that manages that data → the technology that runs that application. This makes impact analysis, cost attribution, and strategic planning far more precise.
Baseline Architecture

Also called "AS-IS". Documents the current state of the enterprise across all four domains. Essential starting point — you cannot plan a transformation if you do not know where you are starting from.

Target Architecture

Also called "TO-BE". Defines the desired future state across all four domains. Aligned directly with business strategy and goals. The gap between baseline and target defines the transformation scope.

🗄️

Architecture Repository

The single source of truth for all architectural assets

The Architecture Repository is the structured storage system for all TOGAF outputs and supporting assets. It is supported by the Enterprise Continuum — a classification system that organises assets from generic, reusable patterns through to organisation-specific implementations.

Architecture Landscape

Stores the current suite of architectures — strategic (long-term direction), segment (specific domains or divisions), and capability (specific capabilities like security or cloud). Three levels of architecture abstraction.

Standards Information Base (SIB)

A repository of approved technology standards — vendor products, technology versions, open standards — that projects must comply with. The SIB prevents ungoverned technology sprawl.

Reference Library

Pre-existing architectural patterns, reference architectures, and guidance documents. Includes TOGAF's own reference models (TRM and III-RM) and any organisation-specific templates.

Solution Landscape

A portfolio view of implemented solutions (SBBs) and what capabilities they deliver. Used for impact analysis, application portfolio management, and identifying decommission candidates.

Governance Log

Records of architecture decisions, ARB minutes, waivers, compliance assessments, and change requests. Provides an audit trail of all governance activity over time.

Architecture Capability

The framework, processes, roles, skills, and maturity models that define how the architecture function operates. Stored here so the EA practice itself is documented and improvable.

In practice: The Architecture Repository is implemented in specialised EA tools such as LeanIX, Sparx Enterprise Architect, MEGA HOPEX, Avolution Abacus, or even structured in a wiki and SharePoint for smaller organisations. The principle matters more than the specific tool.
⚙️

Architecture Capability Framework

How to establish, run, and mature an EA function

The Architecture Capability Framework addresses the meta-level question: how do you set up an architecture function that can sustain and evolve TOGAF over time? It defines the people, processes, and organisational structures needed.

Architecture Board

A cross-functional governance body — typically the Architecture Review Board (ARB) — responsible for reviewing and approving architectures, issuing waivers, and setting standards. Usually chaired by the Chief Architect or CTO.

Architecture Principles

Fundamental rules and guidelines that guide architectural decisions. Examples: "Reuse before Buy, Buy before Build", "Data is an Enterprise Asset", "Design for Cloud-First". Principles are produced in the Preliminary Phase and applied throughout.

Architecture Contracts

Formal agreements between the architecture function and delivery teams. Specify what a project will build, what standards it will comply with, and how compliance will be demonstrated at key review points.

Compliance Framework

A defined process for assessing whether projects conform to approved architecture. Typically includes architecture checkpoints in the delivery lifecycle (at inception, design, and pre-production stages).

Architecture Maturity Model

TOGAF references the ACMM (Architecture Capability Maturity Model) — organisations self-assess where they are and where they want to be:

LevelNameCharacteristics
0NoneNo enterprise architecture process exists. IT decisions are ad hoc and project-driven.
1InitialSome architecture documentation exists but is informal, inconsistent, and not actively governed.
2Under DevelopmentArchitecture processes and roles being established. Basic governance starting. Limited reuse.
3DefinedDocumented, organisation-wide EA practice. ARB in place. Architecture repository maintained.
4ManagedArchitecture metrics collected. Compliance enforced. Architecture linked to portfolio management.
5OptimisingContinuous improvement. Architecture drives strategic business planning. Highly mature governance.
🛡️

Architecture Governance

Keeping the architecture alive, enforced, and relevant

Governance is what separates TOGAF from a documentation exercise. Without governance, architecture artefacts become shelf-ware — documents that are produced once and ignored. TOGAF's governance model ensures architecture remains a living, enforced standard.

Architecture Review Board (ARB)

A cross-functional board that reviews, approves, or rejects architectures. Members typically include the Chief Architect, business representatives, domain architects, and security. Meets regularly (monthly or quarterly for strategic reviews, ad hoc for project reviews).

Architecture Compliance

Projects are assessed at defined checkpoints against the approved target architecture. Outcomes: Fully Conformant, Conformant, Partially Conformant, Nonconformant, and Exempt (with an approved waiver).

Waivers & Dispensations

A formal process for projects that cannot comply with a standard (legacy constraints, time pressure, cost). Waivers are time-limited and tracked. They prevent the governance process from becoming a blocker to delivery.

⚠️
Governance ≠ bureaucracy: A common failure mode is governance becoming a lengthy, checkbox-heavy process that delays projects without adding value. Effective TOGAF governance is proportional to risk — lightweight reviews for low-impact projects, rigorous review for strategic or cross-cutting changes. Right-size the governance to the organisation.
👥

Roles & Stakeholders

Who does what in a TOGAF-enabled architecture practice
RoleResponsibilitiesTypical Profile
Chief Architect / EA Lead Owns the architecture function, chairs or sponsors the ARB, accountable for the EA strategy and roadmap, interfaces with executive leadership (CTO, CIO, CDO). Senior architect with broad business and technology background. Often holds TOGAF certification at Level 2.
Enterprise Architect Runs ADM phases, produces architecture deliverables, engages stakeholders, maintains the Architecture Repository, supports governance reviews. Experienced architect, cross-domain knowledge, strong communication skills. TOGAF certified.
Domain Architect Responsible for a specific domain — Business Architect, Data Architect, Application Architect, or Technology/Infrastructure Architect. Deep expertise in one domain, collaborates with the EA team to produce domain-specific views.
Solution Architect Designs the technical solution for a specific project within the constraints set by the enterprise architecture. Bridges EA and delivery teams. Strong technical background, translates architectural principles into project-level designs.
Architecture Review Board Approves architectures and standards, issues waivers, resolves architecture conflicts, sets direction for the architecture practice. Cross-functional: EA lead, business stakeholders, domain architects, security, sometimes external CXOs.
Business Stakeholders Provide business strategy input, validate business architecture, approve vision and scope, fund transformation roadmaps. CXOs, business unit heads, product owners. Must be engaged throughout — not just at the start.
Project / Delivery Teams Implement solutions within architecture constraints. Attend compliance reviews, raise change requests when constraints cannot be met. Project managers, developers, product managers. Consumers of the architecture, not producers.
⚖️

TOGAF vs Other Frameworks

Zachman, ArchiMate, SAFe, FEAF — where TOGAF fits
FrameworkTypeKey Difference to TOGAFOften Combined?
Zachman Framework Classification / Taxonomy A matrix-based ontology for classifying architecture artefacts. It tells you what to document, not how to develop architecture. TOGAF provides the process Zachman lacks. Yes — Zachman for classification, TOGAF for process.
ArchiMate Modelling Language A standard modelling notation for enterprise architecture (like UML for EA). It is the language you draw TOGAF architectures in. ArchiMate and TOGAF are designed to work together. Yes — ArchiMate is the de facto modelling language for TOGAF.
FEAF (Federal EA Framework) Government EA Framework US federal government-specific EA framework. Similar goals to TOGAF but with government-specific reference models and mandated for US federal agencies. Rarely — organisations typically choose one.
SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) Agile Scaling Method Focuses on agile delivery at scale. Includes a "Solution Architect" role and some architecture thinking, but does not provide full EA depth. Complementary, not a replacement. Yes — TOGAF for EA strategy, SAFe for agile delivery governance.
ITIL IT Service Management Focuses on IT service operations and lifecycle. TOGAF focuses on the architecture of the enterprise. ITIL operates what TOGAF designs — they address different lifecycle stages. Yes — complementary across the IT lifecycle.
COBIT IT Governance Framework Focuses on IT governance, risk, and control. TOGAF's governance component aligns well with COBIT. COBIT is audit and compliance focused; TOGAF is architecture-development focused. Yes — COBIT for governance rigour, TOGAF for architecture process.
Complementary, not competing: Most mature organisations use TOGAF alongside ArchiMate (modelling), ITIL (service management), and COBIT (governance). TOGAF is the architectural backbone, and the others address adjacent concerns. The skill is knowing which framework addresses which problem.
⚠️

Common Pitfalls

Why TOGAF implementations fail — and how to avoid them
Architecture for Architecture's Sake

Producing extensive, beautifully detailed architecture documents that nobody reads or uses. Architecture must have a clear consumer — a decision, a project, a standard — or it is waste. Every artefact should answer a specific stakeholder concern.

No Executive Sponsorship

Architecture without authority is advice. If the ARB cannot enforce decisions, projects will ignore it. TOGAF requires genuine C-suite commitment — typically from the CTO or CIO — to fund the practice and mandate compliance.

Ivory Tower Architecture

Architects who design in isolation from delivery teams produce architectures that are impractical to implement. Architects must be embedded in (or closely engaged with) delivery. Architecture arrogance destroys adoption.

Over-Engineering the Process

Applying every TOGAF phase, deliverable, and artefact regardless of scope. TOGAF is a framework — it must be tailored. A small digital initiative does not need a full ADM cycle. Proportionality is essential.

Static Architecture

Treating architecture as a one-time deliverable that gets filed and forgotten. Phase H (Architecture Change Management) exists for a reason. Architecture must be actively maintained as the business and technology landscape changes.

Skipping Stakeholder Engagement

Architecture decisions that affect the business must involve business stakeholders. A technically perfect architecture that the business did not shape and does not understand will never be adopted. Architecture is a sociotechnical discipline.

🔗

Reference Links

Official standards, learning resources, tools, and community
📚
Getting started recommendation: Begin with the free online TOGAF 9.2 documentation at pubs.opengroup.org. Download Archi (free) and model a small slice of your own organisation using ArchiMate notation. Then consider pursuing the TOGAF Foundation (Level 1) certification as a structured learning path.