Platform Reference
Multi-Cloud Landing Zones & Governance
DOC-MCLZ-2026 · v2.0
Platform Engineering Reference · Updated July 2026

Multi-Cloud Landing Zones & Governance

A platform engineering reference for account structure, identity hierarchy, network foundations, security guardrails, policy frameworks, sovereignty design, and governance operating models across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform.

Platform Engineering AWS · Azure · GCP Security Baselines Sovereign Cloud Policy-as-Code
What's New — v2.0 2026 refresh: new policy types, sovereign landing zones, and AI workload guardrails
  • AWS: Control Tower landing zone v4.0 "Controls-Only" experience with optional service integrations and account auto-enrollment; Resource Control Policies (RCPs) are now a standard third guardrail alongside SCPs and Declarative Policies; Control Tower is available in the AWS European Sovereign Cloud as of January 2026.
  • Azure: ALZ/SLZ platform library 2026.04.2 adds a dedicated "Local" management group beneath Landing Zones (for Azure Local / hybrid / disconnected operations), and the Sovereign Landing Zone now assigns built-in policy initiatives aligned to sovereign control levels 1–3, replacing the earlier Sovereignty Baseline initiatives.
  • GCP: Cloud Foundation Fabric (v56.x) continues as the reference Terraform implementation for FAST-based landing zones, with org-level IAM deny policies now part of the standard organization schema alongside org policy constraints.
  • New section: Policy Frameworks (§07) consolidates SCP / RCP / Declarative Policy on AWS, Azure Policy + Local MG on Azure, and Org Policy + IAM Deny Policy on GCP into one reference.
  • New section: Sovereignty & Digital Residency (§08) — sovereign cloud and data-residency requirements are now a first-class landing zone design input, not a retrofit.
  • New section: AI & Agentic Workload Guardrails (§11) — treating AI agent identities and MCP connector access as a governed resource type under the same landing zone discipline as human and CI/CD identities.
02

What Is a Landing Zone

// FOUNDATIONAL DEFINITION

A landing zone is a pre-configured, multi-account cloud environment that enforces security, identity, network, and compliance baselines before any application workload lands. It is infrastructure-as-policy: the goal is to make the compliant path the easy path.

Key idea: A landing zone is not a one-time deployment. It is a living platform foundation that evolves with your organization's posture, provider tooling releases, and compliance requirements — including the sovereignty and AI-governance requirements that became mainstream through 2026.

Core Outcomes a Landing Zone Must Deliver

  • Account isolation between workloads and environments
  • Consistent identity and least-privilege access controls enforced by default
  • Network segmentation with controlled egress and ingress
  • Enforced security guardrails — preventative, detective, and (as of 2026) declarative/configuration-level
  • Audit trails and observability from day one, not retrofitted
  • Self-service account onboarding for teams without bypassing controls
  • A defined data-residency and sovereignty posture, decided at design time rather than discovered during an audit
03

Account / Subscription / Project Structure

// ORGANIZATIONAL HIERARCHY

Organize cloud accounts into a hierarchy that reflects risk, compliance, and team boundaries — not feature boundaries.

Recommended Hierarchy

ROOT — Organization / Tenant
Security OU
Audit · Log Archive · SIEM
Infrastructure OU
Network Hub · DNS · Shared Services
Sandbox OU
Exploratory · Auto-expiry · Billing Cap
Workloads OU
Application accounts
Dev
Relaxed guardrails
Staging
Prod-like, no egress
Prod
Strictest, full logging
Azure adds a fifth branch in 2026. The Azure landing zone platform library now defines a dedicated Local management group beneath Landing Zones, sitting alongside Corp and Online. It governs Azure Local clusters and workloads designed to be portable to disconnected operation, and it is inherited automatically by the Sovereign Landing Zone hierarchy.

Structural Rules

  • One account/subscription per environment per workload boundary — no mixing
  • Security and log archive accounts owned by the platform team; never delegated
  • Sandbox accounts must have hard billing caps and auto-expiry policies
  • Never mix production and non-production workloads in the same account
  • All new accounts created through the vending machine pipeline, never the console
  • On Azure, decide up front whether any workloads need a path to Local/disconnected operation — retrofitting the Local management group later means re-homing subscriptions
04

Identity & Access Hierarchy

// FEDERATED, SHORT-LIVED, LEAST-PRIVILEGE

Core Principles

  • Centralize the identity provider — never create cloud-local users for humans
  • Use short-lived credentials; eliminate long-lived access keys entirely
  • Apply least privilege at every layer: org, account, resource, and action
  • Separate duty between the platform team (account management) and application teams (workload IAM)
  • MFA required for all human console access without exception

Role Tier Structure

Role TierWho Uses ItCredential Lifetime
Break-glass / emergency adminSecurity team onlySession < 1 hour, every use alerted
Platform adminCloud platform teamFederated session, max 8 h
Workload adminApplication team leadFederated session, max 8 h
Developer read-onlyAll engineersFederated session, max 4 h
CI/CD service identityPipelinesOIDC short-lived token — no static key
Workload runtime identityApplication processesInstance profile / Managed Identity / WIF
AI agent identity NEWAutonomous agent loops, MCP-connected toolsScoped, short-lived; see §11
Non-negotiable: CI/CD pipelines must use OIDC workload identity federation. Static credentials committed to repos or stored in secret managers for pipeline use are a violation of this standard.
05

Network Foundations

// HUB-AND-SPOKE TOPOLOGY

Hub-and-Spoke Topology

All spoke VPCs/VNets connect to a hub that owns shared services. Spokes never peer directly with each other.

Internet
WAF / DDoS Protection
Hub Network
Firewall · NAT · DNS · VPN / Direct Connect
Dev Spoke
10.1.0.0/16
Staging Spoke
10.2.0.0/16
Prod Spoke
10.3.0.0/16
⟷ On-Premises Network (site-to-site VPN or dedicated circuit into the hub)

Egress Control Standards

Traffic TypeRequirement
Internet egressProxied via centralized firewall with domain allowlist
Inter-spokeTransits hub; explicit firewall rule required per path
Cloud-to-on-premisesSite-to-site VPN or dedicated circuit; no public internet path
PaaS servicesPrivate endpoints / VPC endpoints only; disable public endpoint after activation
Inbound / ingressWAF required for HTTP(S); allowlisted ports only; no wildcard rules
MCP / agent connector calls NEWRouted through a controlled gateway; no direct outbound from agent runtime — see §11

IP Addressing Standards

  • Allocate non-overlapping RFC 1918 ranges per environment tier at landing zone creation
  • Reserve a /16 per tier to allow future spoke growth without re-addressing
  • Maintain a central IPAM record (AWS VPC IPAM, Azure VNet Manager, or equivalent)
  • Never reuse CIDR ranges previously routed to on-premises
  • Enable VPC/VNet flow logs on all subnets at creation time, not retroactively
06

Security Baselines

// PREVENTATIVE, DETECTIVE, DECLARATIVE

Security baselines are guardrails the landing zone enforces on every account automatically. Preventative guardrails block non-compliant actions; detective guardrails alert on non-compliant state; declarative guardrails continuously hold a service configuration in the desired state, even as the provider ships new APIs.

Preventative Guardrails

ControlAWSAzureGCP
Deny public storage bucketsSCP / RCPAzure Policy (Deny)Org Policy Constraint
Require encryption at restSCP + ConfigAzure PolicyOrg Policy
Restrict allowed regionsSCPAzure Policy (allowed locations)Org Policy
Deny root / global admin API callsSCPConditional AccessOrg Policy
Deny long-lived IAM keys for humansSCPConditional Access / EntraOrg Policy
Restrict resource access to trusted identities NEWResource Control Policy (RCP)Private Link + Conditional AccessVPC Service Controls + IAM Deny Policy

Detective Guardrails

ControlAWSAzureGCP
Config drift monitoringAWS ConfigAzure Policy / DefenderSecurity Command Center
Unused credential alertsIAM Access AnalyzerEntra ID reportsIAM Recommender
Public resource exposure alertSecurity HubDefender for CloudSecurity Command Center
Root / global admin login alertCloudTrail + EventBridgeEntra audit logsCloud Audit Logs
Unencrypted storage alertAWS Config RuleAzure PolicySCC Finding

Mandatory Logging

All accounts must ship the following to the centralized log archive account from day one:

  • Management plane / audit events (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Cloud Audit Logs)
  • VPC / VNet flow logs
  • DNS query logs
  • Authentication events: login, role assumption, privilege escalation
  • Config change events
  • AI agent tool-call and connector invocation logs, tagged with session ID (see §11)
Retention minimum: 1 year hot storage, 7 years cold archive. Application teams must not have delete access to the log archive account.
07

Policy Frameworks — 2026 Refresh

// SCP · RCP · DECLARATIVE POLICY · ORG POLICY · IAM DENY

Every major provider now ships more than one policy type, and picking the wrong one for a control objective either under-protects the environment or creates unnecessary operational friction. This section consolidates the current (2026) policy surface for each provider.

AWS — Three Policy Types, Three Jobs

Service Control Policy Principal-centric

Limits what an IAM principal inside your organization can do. Since late 2025, SCPs support the full IAM policy language, including NotResource, conditions on Allow statements, and individual resource ARNs — not just wildcard denies.

Resource Control Policy Resource-centric

Sets the maximum permissions available on a resource, regardless of who is calling — including principals external to the organization. Complements SCPs to close the "resource policy bypass" gap. Supports S3, STS, KMS, SQS, and Secrets Manager at launch, with coverage expanding. Effective permissions are the intersection of RCP, identity policy, and resource policy.

Declarative Policy Configuration-centric

Holds a service's configuration in a desired state at the control-plane level — for example, blocking internet gateway access on new VPCs, or preventing public AMI sharing — and keeps enforcing it even as the service adds new APIs, including against service-linked roles that SCPs and RCPs cannot restrict.

AWS — Policy Type Decision Order
# When defining a new AWS guardrail, work through this order: 1. Does AWS Control Tower ship a built-in managed control for this? → Use the Control Catalog control. Do not hand-roll it. 2. Is there a Declarative Policy attribute for this exact setting? → Prefer Declarative Policy. It self-heals as the service evolves and also binds service-linked roles. 3. Is the objective "restrict what MY principals can do"? → Use an SCP. 4. Is the objective "restrict who can reach a given RESOURCE, including external accounts and confused-deputy risk"? → Use an RCP. Test on one account/OU before attaching to root. # RCPs and SCPs are independent policy types with independent quotas: # up to 5 policies per root/OU/account, 1000 policies stored per org.

Azure — Policy + the New Local Management Group

  • Azure Policy (Deny / Audit / Modify / DeployIfNotExists effects) remains the primary preventative and remediation engine, assigned at management group scope and inherited downward.
  • The ALZ platform library moved to Azure Verified Modules (AVM) as the recommended deployment mechanism over the older portal-based Accelerator UI — deploy via Terraform or Bicep AVM patterns, not manual console changes.
  • The new Local management group (library release 2026.04.2) sits beneath Landing Zones alongside Corp and Online. It gives Azure Local clusters and disconnected-capable workloads a consistent governance home, and is inherited by the Sovereign Landing Zone automatically.
  • Conditional Access policies in Microsoft Entra ID continue to carry identity-layer guardrails (MFA enforcement, device compliance, session controls) that Azure Policy does not cover.

GCP — Org Policy Constraints Plus IAM Deny Policies

  • Org Policy Constraints remain the primary preventative control, applied at organization or folder level and inherited by projects.
  • IAM Deny Policies are now a standard part of the organization schema in Cloud Foundation Fabric — they set explicit deny rules that no Allow policy can override, closing gaps that Org Policy constraints alone don't reach (for example, denying specific principals org-wide regardless of any grants made later).
  • VPC Service Controls continue to define a service perimeter around sensitive data services (BigQuery, Cloud Storage, etc.), preventing exfiltration even by principals with valid IAM grants.
Layer, don't duplicate. Preventative, detective, and declarative/deny controls solve different problems. A resource can be simultaneously covered by an SCP, an RCP, and a Declarative Policy on AWS — or by Org Policy and an IAM Deny Policy on GCP — without conflict, because each evaluates independently and the most restrictive applicable rule wins.
08

Sovereignty & Digital Residency

// A 2026 FIRST-CLASS DESIGN INPUT

Through 2025 and into 2026, sovereign cloud requirements moved from a niche public-sector concern to a mainstream landing zone design input across regulated industries and EU-based organizations. Decide the sovereignty posture during the landing zone design phase — retrofitting it means re-platforming workloads.

AWS European Sovereign Cloud

A distinct, EU-based AWS partition — available since January 2026 — operated and controlled independently, designed for customers whose regulatory posture requires infrastructure, operations, and support to stay within the EU. Control Tower is supported for landing zone deployment inside this partition.

Azure Sovereign Landing Zone (SLZ)

Extends the standard ALZ hierarchy with sovereign policy initiatives now aligned to explicit sovereign control levels 1, 2, and 3 — replacing the earlier, less granular Sovereignty Baseline initiatives. Choose the control level based on data-residency and operational-sovereignty requirements, not just data classification.

GCP Sovereign Controls

Data-residency and sovereignty are enforced through Org Policy resource-location constraints, Assured Workloads-style control packages, and CMEK-based key sovereignty — layered onto the same folder/project hierarchy used for the rest of the landing zone rather than a separate platform.

Sovereignty Design Checklist

  • Classify workloads by residency requirement (none / data-at-rest / data-in-use / full operational sovereignty) before choosing account, subscription, or project placement
  • Confirm which control/support staff can access the environment — some sovereign tiers restrict this to in-region, vetted personnel
  • Verify encryption key ownership and location (customer-managed keys, held in-region) for any workload with a residency requirement
  • Treat sovereignty tier as an OU / management group / folder boundary, not a tag — tags are advisory, hierarchy boundaries are enforceable
  • Re-validate sovereignty posture on every landing zone library upgrade — policy initiative names and scopes change between releases (as they did with the April 2026 SLZ refresh)
Don't conflate region selection with sovereignty. Deploying resources in an EU region does not by itself satisfy operational sovereignty requirements around support-staff access, key custody, or subcontractor jurisdiction. Use the provider's purpose-built sovereign offering when the requirement is genuinely about sovereignty, not just data residency.
09

DNS & Connectivity Standards

// PRIVATE-FIRST RESOLUTION

DNS Architecture

  • Deploy private hosted zones per VPC/VNet; internal services resolve by name, never by IP
  • Central DNS resolvers in the hub VPC/VNet handle cross-spoke and on-premises resolution
  • Internal names must not resolve from the public internet (no split-horizon leakage)
  • DNS over HTTPS is not permitted for workloads — all queries route through the controlled resolver

Private Endpoint Policy

  • All PaaS services (object storage, databases, queues, key management) must use private endpoints
  • Disable the public endpoint on every PaaS resource after the private endpoint is confirmed healthy
  • Private endpoint DNS entries must be registered in the central private zone automatically at creation
  • Do not rely on manual DNS record management — automate via IaC or an event-driven pipeline
10

Cloud-Native Landing Zone Tooling

// REFERENCE IMPLEMENTATIONS, 2026

AWS: Control Tower + Account Factory for Terraform

  • AWS Control Tower landing zone v4.0 introduces a "Controls-Only" experience — you can now selectively disable individual service integrations (and Control Tower removes the associated managed resources cleanly) instead of an all-or-nothing deployment.
  • Auto-enrollment can be configured so accounts moved into a registered OU automatically inherit baselines and controls, without a manual Account Factory step.
  • Extend with Account Factory for Terraform (AFT) for IaC-managed account vending with customizations.
  • Deploy an AWS Security Hub aggregator in the security account to consolidate cross-account findings.
  • Enroll all new accounts via Control Tower Account Factory or auto-enrollment — never create accounts manually in the console.

Azure: Azure Landing Zones (ALZ) + Sovereign Landing Zone (SLZ)

  • Microsoft's reference implementation now favors Azure Verified Modules (AVM)-based Terraform and Bicep deployment through the ALZ IaC Accelerator, over the earlier ALZ Portal accelerator.
  • Management group hierarchy: Root → Platform → Landing Zones (Corp / Online / Local) → Sandbox.
  • Built-in policy initiatives enforce logging, Defender for Cloud, encryption, and region restrictions automatically; SLZ layers sovereign control-level initiatives on top.
  • Deploy via Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions pipelines using the library at its current release (2026.04.2 or later) — not the portal.

GCP: Cloud Foundation Fabric

  • Google Cloud Foundation Fabric (GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-foundation-fabric) is the reference Terraform implementation, with Fabric FAST as the stage-based, opinionated bootstrap path.
  • Resource hierarchy: Organization → Folders (per environment) → Projects.
  • Enforced via Org Policy Constraints applied at folder level, plus organization-level IAM Deny Policies, both inherited by all projects beneath.
  • Use the Project Factory module (Terraform) for self-service project vending with guardrail inheritance.

Patterns Common to All Providers

ConcernPattern
New account / project creationVending machine pipeline (IaC + CI/CD); never manual console
Guardrail deploymentApply at org / MG / folder root; individual accounts inherit, never override
Logging destinationDedicated audit account; app teams get read-only access only
Break-glass accessCredentials in secrets manager; alert on every use; time-limited session
Drift detectionContinuous compliance scan; P1 deviations alert within 15 minutes
Landing zone library upgradesTrack upstream release notes as a recurring platform-team task, not a one-off — 2026 saw multiple structural changes (AWS LZ v4.0, ALZ 2026.04.2)
11

AI & Agentic Workload Guardrails

// A NEW RESOURCE TYPE, THE SAME OLD DISCIPLINE

By 2026, autonomous agent loops and MCP-connected tools became a routine workload type inside application landing zones — not a separate platform. The governance answer is not a new control plane; it's applying existing landing zone discipline (identity, network egress, secrets, audit logging) to a resource type that acts faster and less predictably than a human operator.

Agent & Connector Identity Least Privilege
  • Agent runtime identities use the same short-lived, workload-identity mechanisms as any other service (Managed Identity, WIF, instance profile) — never a static key
  • Scope MCP connector credentials to the exact operations required; treat "read" and "write" connectors as separate grants with separate approval
  • Register agent and MCP connector identities in the same IAM inventory as human and CI/CD identities — no shadow credential store
Network & Data Perimeter Contain Blast Radius
  • Route all agent and MCP connector calls through a controlled gateway, not direct outbound from the agent runtime
  • Apply the same private-endpoint and egress-allowlist rules from §05 to any service an agent can reach
  • Use RCPs / VPC Service Controls / Azure Private Link to ensure an agent's elevated reach cannot become a path to a resource a human in the same role couldn't access

Guardrail Checklist for Agent-Accessible Accounts

  • Every MCP server and connector is a governed, inventoried asset — approved before activation, not discovered after the fact
  • Audit log every connector invocation with a session ID, correlated to the same log archive account used for human and CI/CD activity
  • Apply budget and blast-radius limits (turn count, cost, duration) to autonomous loops the same way you'd apply quotas to a shared sandbox account
  • No agent identity gets write access to production landing zone guardrails (SCP/RCP/Org Policy) — that remains a human-gated platform-team action
  • Treat a bad agent-written memory or instruction as a security incident class, not a bug — it can bias every subsequent decision the agent makes
Don't create an "AI exception" OU. The temptation is to carve out a looser-guardrail sandbox for agentic experimentation. Apply the same least-privilege, network-perimeter, and audit standards used for any other workload — an agent with unattended write access and broad network reach is a bigger operational risk than a human with the same access, not a smaller one.
12

Governance Operating Model

// OWNERSHIP AND REVIEW CADENCE

A landing zone without a governance loop decays. Establish clear ownership and a review cadence before day one.

Role Ownership

RoleResponsibility
Cloud Platform TeamLanding zone definition, vending pipeline, hub network, shared services, library/version upgrades
Security TeamDetective guardrails, SIEM integration, access review cadence, exception sign-off, RCP/Deny policy design
FinOps / Cost TeamTagging policy, budget alerts, rightsizing recommendations
Application TeamConsumes accounts via vending machine; owns workload IAM, workload network rules, and any agent/MCP connectors it deploys
Compliance / RiskReviews control exceptions; signs off on guardrail relaxation requests and sovereignty tier assignment

Review Cadence

ReviewFrequencyOwner
Guardrail compliance dashboardContinuous (automated)Platform + Security
Privileged role and agent-identity access reviewQuarterlySecurity
OU / account structure reviewSemi-annualPlatform
Cost and quota reviewMonthlyFinOps
DR drill for platform accountsAnnualPlatform + Security
Landing zone version upgradePer provider major releasePlatform

Exception Process

  1. Application team submits exception request with business justification and compensating controls
  2. Security team reviews and classifies as accepted risk or rejected within 5 business days
  3. Accepted exceptions are time-boxed (maximum 90 days) and tracked in a risk register
  4. Exceptions automatically expire; teams must re-justify to extend
Anti-pattern: Permanent exceptions are architectural debt. Every exception that persists past its expiry without re-justification is a control gap. Automate expiry enforcement.
13

Cloud Mappings

// CONCEPT EQUIVALENTS ACROSS PROVIDERS
ConceptAWSAzureGCP
Root groupingOrganizationTenant / Root Management GroupOrganization
Account groupingOrganizational Unit (OU)Management GroupFolder
Isolation unitAccountSubscriptionProject
Landing zone toolingControl Tower v4.0 + AFTAzure Landing Zones (AVM / Bicep / TF, lib 2026.04.2)Cloud Foundation Fabric (FAST)
Principal-centric guardrailService Control Policy (SCP)Azure Policy (Deny effect)Org Policy Constraint
Resource-centric guardrail NEWResource Control Policy (RCP)Private Link + Conditional AccessVPC Service Controls
Configuration-enforcement guardrail NEWDeclarative PolicyAzure Policy (DeployIfNotExists / Modify)Org Policy (managed constraints)
Explicit deny across all grants NEWRCP explicit Deny statementAzure Policy Deny + Conditional Access blockIAM Deny Policy
Detective guardrailsAWS Config + Security HubDefender for Cloud + Azure PolicySecurity Command Center
Sovereign / regulated variant NEWAWS European Sovereign CloudSovereign Landing Zone (control levels 1–3)Sovereign controls via Org Policy + Assured Workloads-style packages
Hybrid / disconnected governance home NEWOutposts account/OU patternLocal management groupDistributed Cloud project pattern
Identity federationIAM Identity Center (SSO)Microsoft Entra IDCloud Identity / Workspace
Workload identityIAM Role (Instance Profile)Managed IdentityWorkload Identity Federation
CI/CD identityOIDC → IAM RoleOIDC → Workload IdentityOIDC → WIF + Service Account
Centralized loggingCloudTrail + S3 (audit account)Diagnostic Settings → Log AnalyticsCloud Audit Logs → GCS Sink
Hub networkingTransit Gateway + AWS FirewallVirtual WAN + Azure FirewallNetwork Connectivity Center + Cloud Firewall
Private connectivityVPC Endpoint (Interface / Gateway)Private EndpointPrivate Service Connect
Private DNSRoute 53 Private Hosted ZoneAzure Private DNS ZoneCloud DNS Private Zone
IP address managementVPC IPAMAzure VNet ManagerCustom IPAM (no native equivalent)
Secrets managementAWS Secrets ManagerAzure Key VaultSecret Manager
14

Implementation Checklist

// DAY-ONE AND ONGOING VERIFICATION

Organization & Structure

  • Root organization / tenant created and documented
  • OU / management group hierarchy matches security domains (Security, Infrastructure, Workloads, Sandbox, and Local where hybrid/disconnected applies)
  • Account vending machine pipeline operational — no manual account creation
  • Break-glass account exists, stored in secrets manager, alerts on every use
  • Sandbox accounts have billing caps and auto-expiry configured

Identity & Access

  • All human access via federated SSO — no cloud-local users for humans
  • MFA enforced for all human access without exception
  • No long-lived access keys for humans, CI/CD pipelines, or AI agents
  • CI/CD pipelines use OIDC workload identity federation
  • Workload runtime uses instance profile / managed identity / WIF
  • AI agent and MCP connector identities inventoried in the same IAM review as human and CI/CD identities
  • Quarterly access review scheduled and owned

Network

  • Hub VPC/VNet deployed in dedicated infrastructure account
  • Non-overlapping CIDR ranges allocated and recorded in IPAM
  • Flow logs enabled on all VPCs/VNets at creation
  • All internet egress proxied through centralized firewall
  • Spokes do not peer directly with each other
  • Private endpoints deployed for all PaaS services in production
  • Agent/MCP connector calls routed through a controlled gateway, not direct outbound

Policy & Security Baselines

  • SCP / Azure Policy / Org Policy applied at root preventing public storage
  • RCP (AWS) or equivalent resource-centric perimeter defined for externally reachable resources
  • Declarative Policy / DeployIfNotExists coverage evaluated for high-churn service settings
  • Encryption at rest required by policy for all new storage resources
  • All accounts enrolled in Security Hub / Defender for Cloud / Security Command Center
  • Centralized log archive account operational; retention policy enforced (1 yr hot / 7 yr cold)

Sovereignty

  • Workloads classified by residency requirement before account/subscription/project placement
  • Sovereign tier mapped to a hierarchy boundary (OU / management group / folder), not just a tag
  • Encryption key custody and location verified for any workload with a residency requirement
  • Sovereign policy library version tracked and re-validated on every upgrade

Governance

  • Platform, Security, and FinOps ownership documented and acknowledged
  • Compliance dashboard visible to platform and security teams continuously
  • Exception process documented and accessible to application teams
  • Review cadence (quarterly, semi-annual, annual) scheduled in team calendar
  • Landing zone version upgrade process defined and owned
Back to Handbooks